SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Guj) 28

C.V.JANI
RANCHHODBHAI SHAMBHUBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
POPATBHAI SAVJIBHAI PATEL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: MEHUL SHARAD SHAH, P.V.Hathi, SURESH M.SHAH

C. V. JANI, J.

( 1 ) THIS Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure arises from the order passed by the learned Civil Judge (SD) Amreli rejecting the application Exh. 69 for amendment of the written statement in Special Civil Suit No. 97 of 1983

( 2 ) THE opponents in this Revision Application have filed Special Civil Suit No 97/1983 against the applicant for recovering certain amounts with interest On the basis of a writing executed by him as a result of agreement between the parties on 28 on which date the partnership between them came to be dissolved

( 3 ) THE applicant filed his written statement at Exh. 48 He did not admit the plaintiffs claim and contended that the suit was bad for misjoinder of parties and misjoinder of causes of action He contended that the plaintiffs had managed to place him in a financially embarrassing position compelling him to agree to pay the amount due to them by instalment Because of their non-cooperative and adverse attitude as alleged by the defendant he was unable to run the business profitably He averred that he is willing to pay the amount that may be found due to the plaintiffs but he should be granted monthly instalme










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top