SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Guj) 143

R.K.ABICHANDANI, R.A.MEHTA
BHUPENDRAKUMAR NARSINHBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: R.M.CHHAYA, S.N.SHELAT

R. A. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) THE question raised in this petition is directly covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of P. M. Ashwathanarayana Setty and Ors. v. State of Karnataka, AIR 1989 SC 100 confirming the judgment of the Bombay High Court in the case of Mrs. Jyoti Nikul Jariwala and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1988 Bombay 123.

( 2 ) THE petitioner applied for succession certificate and letters of administration on the death of his father. The application was registered as Succession Miscellaneous Application No. 166 of 1990 in the Court of the Civil Judge (S. D.), Baroda. The succession certificate has been ordered to be issued in favour of the petitioner. However, the actual issuance of succession certificate is held up on account of non-payment of Courtfees. According to the respondent authorities, having regard to the valuation of the property of Rs. 7,52,760. 00 the Court-fees payable would be rs. 54,000/ -.

( 3 ) SECTION 29 of the Bombay Court Fees Act provides for the payment of Court fees in respect of probate and letters of administration which reads as follows :"29. (1) No order entitling the petitioner to the grant of probate or letters of administr










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top