SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Guj) 211

D.G.KARIA
Jailaxmi Estate – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.M.PATEL, U.R.BHATT

D. G. KARIA, J.

( 1 ) BY this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenged the validity and legality of the show-cause notice dated April 14, 1983 under section 84c of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (for short,"the said Act") and also the show cause notice dated April 28,1983 at Annexure "e" issued to the petitioner No. 2 to show cause why the N. A. Permission granted in respect of the land in question on May 27, 1981 should not be revoked.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts giving rise to the petition may shortly be stated thus : the petitioner No. 2 was owner and occuplier of the agricultural land bearing survey No. 561 admeasuring 1 Acre 1 Guntha, situated in the sim of village limda in Vaghodia Taluka. It is not in dispute that the said land in an old tenue land. On an application by the petitioner No. 2, the Taluka Development officer, Vaghodia, by his order dated May 27, 1981 ordered to convert the land into non-agricultural one. It is the case of the petitioners that since that date, the land in question was being used for non-agricultural purpose and the petitioners paid non-agricultural charges to the State Governm








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top