SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Guj) 207

S.D.SHAH
HINDUSTAN ZINC LIMITED,udaipur – Appellant
Versus
VIJAYSINH AMARSINH AND COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.C.GANDHI, J.A.ADESHARA, M.R.ANAND, S.M.SHAH

S. D. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) HAVING consistently failed to obtain an order of injunction against encashment of duly executed Bank Guarantee from the Court of Civil Judge, senior Division, Jamnagar, in Special Civil Suit No. 104 of 1988, from the learned single Judge of the High Court of Gujarat in Appeal From Order No. 186 of 1992 as back as 3rd of April, 1992 and also from the Supreme Court of India, in the petition for Special Leave to Appeal being No. 6356 of 1992 as back as 13/05/1992, the stubborn recalcitrant M/s. Vijaysinh Amarsinh and company has by filing second suit on the same cause of action and more or less for same reliefs in the same Court (different Judge) has succeeded in getting an order of injunction against the encashment of the Bank Guarantee. The Civil judge, Senior Division, Jamnagar (V. N. Shah) has by the impugned order dated 7/08/1992 not only rendered meaningless binding directives of the superior courts, i. e. , the High Court of Gujarat and the Supreme Court of India, but has wilfully and deliberately helped recalcitrant litigant in not obeying the orders of the Apex Court of the State and the Apex Court of the Country. It is this order of Civil Judge, Senior Di



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top