S.D.SHAH
HINDUSTAN ZINC LIMITED,udaipur – Appellant
Versus
VIJAYSINH AMARSINH AND COMPANY – Respondent
( 1 ) HAVING consistently failed to obtain an order of injunction against encashment of duly executed Bank Guarantee from the Court of Civil Judge, senior Division, Jamnagar, in Special Civil Suit No. 104 of 1988, from the learned single Judge of the High Court of Gujarat in Appeal From Order No. 186 of 1992 as back as 3rd of April, 1992 and also from the Supreme Court of India, in the petition for Special Leave to Appeal being No. 6356 of 1992 as back as 13/05/1992, the stubborn recalcitrant M/s. Vijaysinh Amarsinh and company has by filing second suit on the same cause of action and more or less for same reliefs in the same Court (different Judge) has succeeded in getting an order of injunction against the encashment of the Bank Guarantee. The Civil judge, Senior Division, Jamnagar (V. N. Shah) has by the impugned order dated 7/08/1992 not only rendered meaningless binding directives of the superior courts, i. e. , the High Court of Gujarat and the Supreme Court of India, but has wilfully and deliberately helped recalcitrant litigant in not obeying the orders of the Apex Court of the State and the Apex Court of the Country. It is this order of Civil Judge, Senior Di
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.