SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Guj) 272

M.S.PARIKH
PANKIL RAJNIKANT PATEL – Appellant
Versus
GUJARAT HOUSING BOARD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.A.Mehta, P.V.Hathi

M. S. PARIKH, J.

( 1 ) WHAT has been prayed in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is to call for the record and proceedings of the Board and the Committee in particular the minutes of the Committees meeting dated 23 to declare that the Committee had no power to reject the petitioners application orally on the ground of ineligibility of the petitioner for allotment of tenement under Higher Income Group (for short HIG) scheme of the respondent- Board to direct the respondent-Board to include the name of the petitioner in the final list of allottees of the HIG scheme also known as Vastrapur scheme and to restrain the respondent by its Board or its Committee from publishing and/or preparing the final list of allottees of the said scheme.

( 2 ) SHORT facts set-up by the petitioner may briefly be reproduced below : the respondent-Gujarat Housing Board initiated a scheme for HIG persons who according to the respondent-Board must have had an income exceeding Rs. 18 0 which was maximum limit for middle income group persons. For the said HIG scheme the respondent acquired the land and started construction in Vastrapur near old Sachivalaya Ahmedabad. The applications






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top