SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Guj) 426

A.P.RAVANI, C.V.JANI
Sourth Gujarat Textile Processors Association – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.H.Mehta, A.K.CLERK, GIRISH PATEL, K.S.Nanavati, M.B.BUCH, MEHUL H.RATHOD, TANVIR M.SHAIKH

C. V. JAM, J.

( 1 ) IN these three petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, notifications issued by the State government of Gujarat under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and abolition) Act, 1970, hereinafter referred to as the act, have been challenged, and since common points are involved in the three petitions, they are being heard and decided together.

( 2 ) A. Special C. A. No. 3754/85 is filed by a firm of contractors engaged in the business of performing job contract work of screen printing of Art Silk Fabrics on behalf of certain principal employers at Surat. They have challenged the notification Annexure-A dated March 11, 1985, issued by the State Government on the recommendation of the State advisory Contract Labour Board prohibiting the employment of contract labour in the establishments of Art Silk textile Units in Surat District and surrounding areas in respect of processes of bleaching, finishing and dying and printing The petitioners have also challenged the vires of Section 10 of the act. 2. B. Spl. C. A. No. 2512/85 in which the said Notification has come under challenge, had been filed by South Gujarat textiles Processors Association,















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top