SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Guj) 424

S.D.SHAH, S.M.SONI
SUSHILABEN DHULABHAI SOLANKI – Appellant
Versus
RAMAKANT DAHYABHAI PARMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.S.SUPEHIA, K.P.RAVAL, M.S.Sharma

SONI, J.

( 1 ) RULE, Mr. Supheia, learned Advocate, waives service of rule for respondent No. 1. Mr. K. P. Raval, learned A. P. P. , waives service of rule on behalf of respondents Nos. 2 and 3.

( 2 ) REAL maternal aunt of minor Tarlika (minor for short) has moved this court under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas corpus against respondent No. 1, father of minor, and produce her before the Court, ascertain her wish as to with whom she is willing to reside, i. e. , with maternal aunt or with the petitioner, and on ascertaining her wish, necessary orders be passed.

( 3 ) IT is necessary to refer to certain facts, which, in our opinion, are most relevant and material for the purpose of deciding this petition. Minor is the first child, aged about 16 years, of respondent No. 1. When minor was aged about four years, her mother had died. Minor had another younger sister named Priti. In view of the tender age of both the daughters, it appeared that the respondent No. 1 arrived at an arrangement with the petitioner, a real maternal aunt of the minors, to the effect that minor tarlika will stay with the petitioner and minor Priti shall stay with respondent No. 1.












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top