SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Guj) 444

K.J.VAIDYA
UMABEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.M.GUPTA, P.S.CHAMPANERI

K. J. VAIDYA, J.

( 1 ) APPREHENDING immediate danger to their respective life, limb and liberty at the hands of Rajesh @ Raju Chandulal Gandhi and others, the respondent-accused herein, two petitioners, viz. , Umaben W/o of Girish Ambalal and Rakesh Pravinchandra Kinariwala, by these two Miscellaneous Criminal applications under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, have moved this Court inter alia praying for the immediate relief / direction, namely : (i) that whenever any bail application is filed by the respondent-accused and any of his coaccused, they be specifically directed to join both of them (petitioners) as party to the said proceedings alongwith the State of Gujarat and (ii) accordingly, the office of High Court (Criminal Branch) on respondent-accused filing bail application be directed to inform the petitioners about the same at their cost, so as to enable them in the first instance to know that accused have moved for the bail and therefore, to be on guard, and in the second instance, to adequately assist the Honble Court and thereby to oppose the bail application. In substance, these two petitions are more or less in nature of "caveat" proceedings. There is









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top