SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Guj) 54

A.P.RAVANI, H.L.GOKHALE
DALVADI LALJIBHAI GATORBHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.D.AJMERA, P.M.THAKKAR, R.M.CHHAYA

A. P. RAVANI, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Mr. R. M. Chhaya, learned A. G. P. waives service of rule on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 4, i. e. , State Government of Gujarat and Shri Vipul Mitra, District Collector, Surendranagar, respectively. Mr. P. M. Thakkar, learned Advocate, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3, i. e. , Surendranagar Joint Municipality, through its Administrator, and Surendranagar Joint Municipality through its Chief Officer, respectively. At the request and with the consent of the learned Advocates appearing for the parties rule issued in the petition is ordered to be heard today.

( 2 ) PETITIONERS challenge the constitutional validity of Secs. 4 and 5 of the Gujarat Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1972, and pray that the respondents be restrained from evicting the petitioners from the space occupied by them in the old vegetable market, near Shravan Talkies, Main Road, surendranagar. The petitioners also pray that the repondents be directed to restore possession of the space occupied by the individuals whose names are mentioned in annexure-A to the petition. The petitioners further pray that the respondents be restrained fr




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top