( 1 ) ). The petitioner in all these Civil Revision Applications who is either original defendants Nos. 1, 2 or 3 in the five suits being Summary suits Nos. 5349 of 1990, 4664 of 1990, 4766 of 1990, 4765 of 1990 and 5166 of 1990 have challenged the orders dated 4-3-1993 passed by the learned Chamber Judge, City Civil Court, Ahmedabad granting conditional leave to defend the suit filed by the respondent No. 1 in all these Civil revision Applications.

( 2 ) ). The respondent No. 1 who is the common plaintiff in all the suits has filed the aforesaid suits against the Company or the partnership firm or the sole proprietor concerned and the same has been shown as defendant No. 1 while the defendant No. 2 Dilip Patel and defendant no. 3 Nitin Patel has been shown in each of the suits as Director or a partner or a sole Proprietor of the concerned defendant No. 1 In substance, the defendants Nos. 2 and 3 are common in all the suits.

( 3 ) ). Summary Suit No. 5349 of 1990 has been filed by the respondent no. 1 against Nubid Agency Ltd. as well as the said two Directors to recover Rs. 58,86,318. 42 ps. wherein the learned Chamber Judge granted conditional leave to defend the suit on