SHARAD D.DAVE
VEDVA VAGHARI RAMESH RAMABHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this Conviction Appeal instead of concerning with the merits of the case, I feel, I am concerned with a technical off-shoot. The question before me is in respect of the real intent and spirit of Art. 21 of the Constitution of India and the provisions contained under Sec. 304 of the Criminal Procedure Code, together with the provisions contained under Paragraph 125 of the Criminal Manual.
( 2 ) THE appellant accused came to be prosecuted for the alleged commission of the offence punishable under Secs. 376 and 502 of Indian penal Code on the accusation that on 7-6-1991 at village Bhilwada under palitana taluka of Bhavnagar district, the appellant accused ravished the minor prosecutrix against her will and without consent. The proceedings have resulted in the judgment of conviction and sentence, under which the appellant accused is sentenced to the R. I. for seven years and a fine of rs. 1000/-, in default to the R. I. of six months for the offence punishable under Sec. 376 of Indian Penal Code. So far as the offence under Sec. 506 (2) of Indian Penal Code is concerned the appellant accused has been sentenced to the R. I. of two years and to a fine of Rs. 500. 00in de
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.