SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Guj) 137

B.N.KIRPAL
SWET RAJHANSH CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.A.Mehta, P.G.DESAI

B. N. KIRPAL, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner herein had filed a suit before the civil Judge (Junior Division ). Surat, for an injunction, to restrain the respondent from demolishing any construction, which had been raised by the petitioner, on a land situated within its jurisdiction.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner, which is a Co-operative Housing Society, it had purchased Plot No. 45 in T. P. Scheme No. 4, which was in Katargam in Survey No. 359/2 from Dhirajlal Gandhi, Pankajkumar Gandhi and ajaykumar Gandhi. Price of Rs. 48. 999. 00 was stated to have been paid to the said sellers and possession of a part of the land had been taken. It was further alleged that the plaintiff had obtained approval of the Lay Out plan of the defendant on 3/04/1970 and the plan regarding construction was also approved by the respondent on 3/11/1972. The allegation of the petitioner herein was that when construction was started at the site, the original owners got an injunction issued against the plaintiff from the respondent herein against the construction. According to the plaintiff, construction had been raised upto the plinth level and injunction should be issued to the respondent, restraining it from








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top