SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Guj) 104

K.G.SHAH
JAYABEN JIVRAJBHAI – Appellant
Versus
KARSANBHAI K. RATHOD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.S.SHAH, S.M.SHAH, S.T.MEHTA

SHAH, J.

( 1 ) LEAVE to add State of Gujarat as a party. Rule. Mr. S. T. Mahta, the learned A. G. P. waives service on behalf of the State which is the only vitally affected party in this revision petition. The Rule is finally heard and will stand disposed of by the following judgment :

( 2 ) THE petitioner filed before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, jamnagar, an application under Sec. 110a of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (for short the Old Act) for claiming compensation for personal injury sustained by her as a result of an automobile accident. Pending that application, she filed an interim application, Exh. 10, under Sec. 92a of the Old Act claiming interim compensation on the ground of no fault liability. In that application, she claimed compensation in the sum of Rs. 12,500. 00. The learned District judge, Jamnagar who acted as the Claims Tribunal under Old Act directed the opponents to the application to deposit Rs. 7,500/- in the office of the tribunal with 12% interest thereon from the date of that application, Exh. 10. Accordingly, the opponents to the main application deposited Rs. 7,782 in the office of the Tribunal. The petitioner applied for the withdrawal of that a











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top