SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Guj) 98

B.J.SHETHNA
GUJARAT ELECRICITY BOARD – Appellant
Versus
Moljibhai Lalabhai Chudasama – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.D.PANDYA

B. J. SHETHNA, J, J.

( 1 ) THIS First Appeal is filed by the Gujarat Electricity Board and its superintending Engineer under section 30 of the Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") against the judgment and award dated 9th July, 1992 in Workmen Compensation Application No. 9 of 1991 by the Commissioner for workmens Compensation, jamnagar, whereby the learned Commissioner partly allowed the application of the workman and awarded Rs. 89245/- to the workman instead of Rs. 92085/- claimed by him with interest at the rate of 6% per annum and also awarded penalty at the rate of 35% over the amount of compensation.

( 2 ) THOUGH this being a First Appeal, under the First Proviso to section 30 (1) of the act, no appeal shall lie against any order unless a substantial question of law is involved in the appeal. Mr. Pandya, learned counsel for the appellants has restricted his challenge in this appeal only to the order of penalty passed by the learned Commissioner. He has framed the following substantial question of law in this appeal for the determination by this Court whether in case of a non-scheduled injury where the employee has failed to produce disability







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top