SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Guj) 160

B.C.PATEL
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF SAURASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.M.Mehta, M.R.ANAND

B. C. PATEL, J.

( 1 ) STATE of Gujarat has preferred this Revision Application against the order passed by Civil Judge, Senior Division, Amreli on 3- 10-1992 on Court Fee Reference No. 4 of 1992 in Special Civil Suit No. 95 of 1989.

( 2 ) FEW facts relevant for the purpose of determining the issue in question are as under : 2. 1 Opponent No. 1 herein State Bank of Saurashtra filed a Special civil Suit No. 95 of 1989 in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, amreli against the opponent No. 2 herein Karshanbhai Manjibhai Dobaria for recovery of Rs. 35,933. 00 with interest at the rate of 16% p. a. and cost on 26-9-1989. Opponent No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) valued the suit at Rs. 35,933. 00 for the purpose of Court Fees. 2. 2 In the plaint, in paragraph 3, it is averred that the opponent No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the defendant) has, for agricultural purpose, submitted an application for cash credit facilities and cash credit facility of Rs. 1,985. 00 was sanctioned by the plaintiff on 14-6-1987. Some property was mortgaged against this facility. Amount was to be paid with interest at 12% p. a. within a period of one year. 2. 3 Again, on 6-7-1988, defend














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top