SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Guj) 318

D.G.KARIA
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
BACHUBHAI NAGINBHAI SHAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: C.C.MORAKHIA, D.D.Vyas, S.R.DIVETIA

D. G. KARIA, J.

( 1 ) MR. S. R. DIVETIA, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, requested to convert this Special Criminal Application into Criminal Revision Application. Request granted.

( 2 ) THE salient and substantial question of law that looms for determination may be stated as under :-"whether the offences under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, extending imprisonment for a term of three years would be a summary triable case or warrant triable case, and what is the effect of the provisions of S. 167 (5) of the Code of criminal Procedure, 1973 ?"

( 3 ) THE points which are said to have arisen for determination and which have been formulated in the memo of this Criminal Revision Application are as under :-" (1) Whether the offences enumerated above under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, wherein the conviction and sentence prescribed is three years is a warrant triable or summons triable case ? (2) Whether in a warrant triable case, S. 167 (5) of the Cr. P. C. is applicable ? (3) Whether S. 116 of the Bombay Prohibition Act and Chapter XXI of the Cr. Procedure Code, 1973 would be applicable ?"

( 4 ) THE facts giving rise to the present revision application are in narrow compass and are

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top