SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Guj) 350

K.R.VYAS
MUSA MAHAMMAD MALEK – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.S.PATEL, K.N.VALIKARIMVALA

K. R. VYAS, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners, who are two amongst the original nine accused of Sessions Case No. 45 of 1993, are facing trial for offences punishable under Secs. 120-B, 143, 147, 148, 149, 302, 323 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that there are cross-cases the other being Criminal Case No. 44 of 1993 which is also pending before the Sessions Court, Baroda.

( 2 ) IT appears that Mr. M. H. Shah, 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Baroda framed charge against the accused in the said case on 25-1-1994. Said Shri Shah was thereafter transferred from Baroda to Surat and the learned Sessions Judge entrusted the said Sessions Cases to Shri S. S. Patel, 3rd Additional Sessions judge. An averment has been made in the petition that the said Shri Patel also decided application Ex. 35 on 4-7-1994 and directed the prosecution to produce certain evidence before the Court on or before 18-7-1994. The Investigating Agency has also partly complied with the said direction. However, the matter was thereafter adjourned to 16-8-1994. It further appears that the learned Sessions Judge, in exercise of the power conferred upon him under Sec. 194 read with Sec. 409 of the Criminal Procedure C








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top