SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Guj) 348

A.N.DIVECHA
EX-SUBEDAR, BHUPATSINGH NANUBHA JETHWA – Appellant
Versus
PRESIDENT,sumer SPORTS CLUB,jamnagar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.R.Nanavati, JANAK V.JAPI

A. N. DIVECHA, J.

( 1 ) ). The decision rendered by the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal at Ahmedabad (the Tribunal for convenience) on 12th August 1994 in Review Application No. TEN. C. R. 2 of 1989 is under challenge in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Thereby the Tribunal rejected the present petitioners application for review of its decision of 29th January 1985 in Revision Application No. TEN. A. R. 9 of 1984.

( 2 ) ). The facts giving rise to this petition are not many and not much in dispute. The dispute centres round one property bearing Survey No. 28/2 situated in Jamnagar (the disputed property for convenience ). By his order passed on 22nd January 1970, respondent No. 3 inter alia held the disputed property to be belonging to Sumer Sports Club (the Club for convenience) represented by respondent No. 1 herein. Its copy is at Annexure-A to this petition. Respondent No. 2 took the order at Annexure-A to this petition in suo motu revision in exercise of his powers under Section 211 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 (the BLR Code for Brief) after about 12 years from its date.

( 3 ) ). By this order passed 25th August 1982 in Revision Application No. 2










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top