SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Guj) 349

C.K.THAKKER
CHANDBHAI MOHMADBHAI SEPAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.P.RAVAL, M.J.DAGLI

C. K. THAKKER, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision application is filed against an order of conviction and sentence passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, palitana on 27/11/1991, in Summary Case No. 1218 of 1990 and confirmed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhavnagar, on 24/12/1992, in criminal Appeal No. 42 of 1991. By the impugned orders, the petitioner was convicted for an offence punishable under Sec. 66 (1) (b) of the Bombay Prohibition act, 1949 (hereinafter to be referred to as "the Act") and was ordered to undergo s. I. for 3 months and to pay fine of Rs. 150. 00 in default of payment of fine, s. I. for 15 days more.

( 2 ) IT is the case of the prosecution that on 26/02/1990, at about 6 p. m. the petitioner, who was serving as police constable, was found drunk at a public place known as Bhairavpura Chowk in Palitana City. He was, therefore, arrested for committing offences punishable under Sec. 66 (1) (b) read with Sec. 85 (1) (3) of the Act. The petitioner did not plead guilty to the charge. The learned Magistrate, by an order dated 27/11/1991, held that it was proved by the prosecution that the petitioner had committed an offence punishable under Sec. 66 (1)












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top