SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Guj) 9

R.K.ABICHANDANI
NARULLA DYEING – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: G.T.DAYANI, H.B.SHAH, HARDIK RAVAL

R. K. ABICHANDANI, J.

( 1 ) ). In this group of matters the petitioners-Industrial units have challenged the action of the State Government taken under Section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), giving directions to them to stop production activities and take necessary steps to make the waste water being discharged by the units to conform to the standards specified by the Gujarat Pollution Control Board and not restart the production activities without the permission of State Government and Forest and Environment Department. The directions were issued by the Forest and Environment Department of the Government to these these (sic.) three industrial units under the impugned orders dated 19th October 1994.

( 2 ) ). The petitioner in Special Civil Application No. 12136/94 is a Partnership firm carrying on business in textile processing and having its (sic.) unit in the G. I. D. C. Estate zone at Naroda, Ahmedabad. The said petitioner had applied for consent of the Gujarat Pollution Control Board (hereinafter referred to as the State Board) under Section 25 (2) of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 (hereinafter re


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top