SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Guj) 23

C.K.THAKKER, S.M.SONI
DHANPAL SINGH BARUN SINGH THAKUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.N.KESHVANI, S.K.BUKHARI

S. M. SONI, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANTS-ORIGINAL accused in Sessions Case No. 264 of 1991 have preferred this appeal. This appeal is filed against the judgment and order of conviction under Sec. 20 (b) (ii) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) and Sec. 66 (1) (b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. Each of the appellants was awarded R. I. for 10 years and a fine of Rs. 1 lac, in default R. I. for one year under NDPS Act. Each of the appellants was also awarded sentence of R. I. for three months and fine of Rs. 500. 00 in default R. I. for one month under prohibition Act. It was also ordered that substantive sentences shall run concurrently. This judgment and order of the Additional City Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad dated 21-1-1992 is under challenge in this appeal.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts leading to the prosecution of the appellants/accused are as under :- pirmohmadkhan Nathekhan Pathan P. W. 7, Police Inspector Vigilance Squad in Crime Branch, Ahmedabad City, received an information at about 22-00 hours on 6-5-1991 from his informant that there is a house of one Sirajbaba in Patwa sheri situated near Electric pole No. PK 791. The same is hired by one Nasir. Said nasir, by e














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top