R.K.ABICHANDANI
CHAITANYAKUMAR HARIKRISHANBHAI BHATT – Appellant
Versus
NALINIBEN C. BHATT – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner-husband challenges the order passed below applications Ex. 11 and Ex. 15 in H. M. Petition No. 328 of 1988, by the learned City Civil Court Judge, on 19-3-1991, allowing the application Ex. 11 filed by the respondent-wife and directing the petitioner-husband to pay to the respondent Rs. 250. 00 per month as interim maintenance for the minor daughter from the date of the petition, i. e. , 19-9-1988 till disposal of the petition and Rs. 2,000. 00 towards expenses for the litigation. The application filed by the petitionerhusband for maintenance at Ex. 15 was dismissed.
( 2 ) THE petitioner filed a divorce petition against the respondent-wife on the allegations that she treated him with cruelty and that she had illicit relation with other person. A daughter was born to these parties. She was two years of age on the date of the Application Ex. 11 made by the respondent-wife. In the said application she has stated that she was serving at Poona and had to attend the Court off and on for which she had to incur expenses. In the application she prayed for the expenses to the tune of Rs. 3,000. 00 for the litigation and also separately prayed for mai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.