SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Guj) 45

R.K.ABICHANDANI
CHAITANYAKUMAR HARIKRISHANBHAI BHATT – Appellant
Versus
NALINIBEN C. BHATT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.J.THAKUR, MUKUND M.DESAI

R. K. ABICHANDANI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner-husband challenges the order passed below applications Ex. 11 and Ex. 15 in H. M. Petition No. 328 of 1988, by the learned City Civil Court Judge, on 19-3-1991, allowing the application Ex. 11 filed by the respondent-wife and directing the petitioner-husband to pay to the respondent Rs. 250. 00 per month as interim maintenance for the minor daughter from the date of the petition, i. e. , 19-9-1988 till disposal of the petition and Rs. 2,000. 00 towards expenses for the litigation. The application filed by the petitionerhusband for maintenance at Ex. 15 was dismissed.

( 2 ) THE petitioner filed a divorce petition against the respondent-wife on the allegations that she treated him with cruelty and that she had illicit relation with other person. A daughter was born to these parties. She was two years of age on the date of the Application Ex. 11 made by the respondent-wife. In the said application she has stated that she was serving at Poona and had to attend the Court off and on for which she had to incur expenses. In the application she prayed for the expenses to the tune of Rs. 3,000. 00 for the litigation and also separately prayed for mai









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top