SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Guj) 82

J.N.BHATT
RANJITSINH SABAALSINH RATHOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.D.DESAI, D.H.CHUDASAMA

J. N. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) THE main substratum of this appeal preferred by a convicted police personnel, is the tale of the protector of Law and Order who turns perpetrator of it in purported exercise of personal right to organise and resort to STRIKE beyond the frontiers of Law and horizons of Justice warranting appreciation of and adjudication under the several provisions of Law relating Police Personnel and police Force in India.

( 2 ) BY filing this appeal, the appellant who is original accused has assailed judgment and order of conviction and sentence, passed against him, by the learned additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad, Rural, on 30-12-1988, in Sessions Case no. 120 of 1988. As per impugned judgment and order of the trial Court, the appellant-accused came to be convicted for the offence punishable under Sec. 3 read with Sec. 4 of the Police Forces (Restrictions of Rights) Act, 1966 [police Forces Act] and also under Sec. 145 (2) of the Bombay Police Act, 1951. The appellant-accused is ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of rs. 1,000/- and in default, to undergo Simple Imprisonment for three months for the offence punishable under Sec. 3 read w




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top