R.BALIA
BARODA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
GAJENDRA R. DHUMAL – Respondent
( 1 ) ). Rule. Mr. S. P. Hasulkar, learned Advocate appears for respondent and waives service of Rule. Heard learned Counsel for the parties on merits.
( 2 ) ). On reference being made, of the following question: the Industrial Tribunal, Vadodara made Award on the following terms on 30-4-1994:
( 3 ) ). Aggrieved with the aforesaid Award, the Municipal Corporation, Vadodara has come up before this Court through this Special Civil Application.
( 4 ) ). To understand contentions and controversy raised before me, it would be necessary to notice brief facts as narrated in the Award. Respondent-Gajendra R. Dhumal (hereinafter called as the workman) was appointed in 1981 by the petitioner-Corporation as Asstt. Draftsman on which post he continued until when his services were wrongly terminated without following the conditions of Chapter V-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Thereafter he was appointed on Tracers post, lower to the post of Asstt. Draftsman from October 1985. By the order dated 9-10-1985, the workman was transferred to another department on the ground that his work in the present department was not satisfactory. However, from the record of the Municipal Corpo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.