SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Guj) 99

K.J.VAIDYA
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
SHAIKH LALA SHAIKH BALU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.M.PANCHAL, K.T.DAVE

K. J. VAIDYA, J.

( 1 ) "whether at the pre-trial stage of deciding the bail application for the alleged offence under Sec. 20 (b) of the Narcotic Drugs and psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, the Court is justified in going into technical questions such as (i) the compliance of the mandatory provisions under Secs. 42 (2) and 50 (1) of the NDPS Act; and (ii) regarding the possession of the house in question from where the muddamal narcotic substance was found out ?" These two questions arise for consideration in the context of the facts and circumstances as enumerated hereunder.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the prosecution, Mr. P. V. Kotwal, PSI, Limbayat Police station, Surat, on receiving the tip-off that Shaikh Lala Shaikh Balu was illegally storing and selling "ganja", he immediately requisitioned the services of two panchas and raided his house on 4-8-1993 at 21-30 hours. At that time, the accused was present in the house and on taking search of his house, from one room, white coloured bag was recovered and on opening the same, "ganja" was found out. On making inquiry about the possession of the said "ganja", the accused had neither any pass nor permit nor could he render any explanation.










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top