SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Guj) 152

B.C.PATEL, M.R.CALLA
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
JAYSUKH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.N.Patel, G.K.UPADHYAY

B. C. PATEL, J.

( 1 ) CRIMINAL Appeal No. 1358 of 1986 is preferred by the State for enhancement of sentence recorded by Assistant Sessions Judge, Gondal on 30th august 1986 whereby the accused was convicted for offences punishable under Secs. 376, 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 300. 00, in default of payment of fine, rigorous imprisonment of 6 months. While passing the sentence, the Court did not pass any separate sentence for offences punishable under Secs. 363 and 366 of the Penal Code. Accused preferred Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 1987 before the Sessions Judge against the aforesaid order of conviction and sentence and by order passed on 22- 9-1989 by the Division Bench of this Court (Coram : R. J. Shah and K. J. Vaidya, jj.) the same was ordered to be transferred to this Court and the said Criminal Appeal no. 4 of 1987 is renumbered as Criminal Appeal No. 17 of 1990. Both the appeals are arising from the common judgment and they are, therefore, heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) SECTION 376 (1) of the Indian Penal Code reads as under :- (1) Whoever, except in the case p






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top