SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Guj) 192

J.N.BHATT
BHARAT HEAVY ELECTICALS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
GENERAL CONTRACTOR COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: SURESH M.SHAH, Y.S.MANKAD

J. N. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision application is directed against the judgment and order passed by the Court of the learned 3rd Joint Civil Judge (S. D.), Bhuj in special Civil Suit No. 1 of 1988 below application Exh. 23 refusing to raise an issue as to the jurisdiction as preliminary issue, by invoking the aids of provisions of Sec. 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (the Code for short ).

( 2 ) THE material facts giving rise to the present petition may be stated. For the work of the petitioner for which tenders were invited by it, the respondent submitted the tender wherein one of the terms and conditions was as under : "5. 2. Effect and jurisdiction of the contract : the contract shall be considered as having come into force on the date of letter of intent. This contract shall in all respects be governed by and construed according to the laws in force in the Republic of India during the period of contract. The civil courts having ordinary original Civil jurisdiction, New Delhi shall have exclusive jurisdiction in regard to all claims in respect of this contract. " there is also an arbitration clause in the tender condition accepted by the respondent on the basis of which







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top