SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Guj) 211

R.K.ABICHANDANI
UDAYSINH SHANKERSINH ZALA – Appellant
Versus
S. D. VADERA ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.G.VYAS, N.N.PANDYA, R.A.MISHRA, TUSHAR MEHTA

R. K. ABICHANDANI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner who was elected of a Sarpanch of demai Gram Panchayat in July, 1989 has challenged the orders passed under Secs. 49 (1) and 49 (3) removing him from the office of Sarpanch on the ground of the alleged misconduct.

( 2 ) A show cause notice was issued on the petitioner on 9/05/1991, a copy of which is at Annexure "j" to the petition under Sec. 49 (1) of the Act on seven charges mentioned therein which were levelled on the footing that though the panchayat had no power to levy toll it had passed a resolution initially on 2 9/03/1990 being resolution No. 14, to levy toll at the rate of Rs. 2. 00 and thereafter had passed another resolution No. 20 (1) dated 28/05/1990 for levying toll with effect from 1-10-1990 on animals carrying burden at the rate of 30 paise per day and thereafter again by resolution No. 4-2 dated 20/09/1990 the Panchayat resolved to give contract for collection of the toll so imposed pursuant to which ijara was given and therefore, petitioner had committed misconduct under Sec. 49 (1) of the Act. By an order dated 22nd October, i 992 passed by the District Development officer under Sec. 49 (1) of the said Act, it was held th




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top