SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Guj) 233

R.K.ABICHANDANI
GLAXO LABORATORIES EMPLAYEES UNION – Appellant
Versus
GLAXO INDIA LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.S.Nanavati, M.B.BUCH, N.R.SAHANI

R. K. ABICHANDANI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner-Union challenges the award dated 1st August, 1994 made by the Industrial Tribunal, Baroda in Reference (IT) No. 103 of 1993 and seeks a declaration that the respondent had sought the undertaking from the workmen illegally and in unjust manner and that it was liable to pay wages from 9th December, 1991 to 23rd April, 1992, with interest being the period during which the workmen could not attend to work due to insistence for executing an unjust undertaking.

( 2 ) THE respondent-Company deals in manufacture and distribution of drugs, pharmaceuticals and food items, having its factories at Worli, Thane, Ankleshwar, nasik and Aligarh. The factory at Ankleshwar was established in 1985 to manufacture ibuprofen and Sotalol Hydroxide initially and later new produces were introduced. On 30th July, 1987, a settlement was arrived at between the parties which ended on 30th June, 1990 when new demands were raised by the Union including demand for 2 days weekly-off, known as 6 x 2 shift system or rota system. There were negotiations between the parties on this issue, but it could not be resolved. In the meeting of the General Body of the Union held on 27t












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top