SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Guj) 283

J.N.BHATT
CHANDRAKANT M. DESHPANDE – Appellant
Versus
VASANTRAO B. TOKE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.A.BUKHARI, P.B.MAJUMDAR

J. N. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) ALLOTMENT of quarter to the employee of the State or the central Government in connection with his employment with the employer could be said or not as acquisition or allotment of the suitable alternative accommodation under Sec. 13 (1) (l) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control act, 1947 (Bombay Rent Act) is the main theme of this Revision Petition. Thus, short and interesting question which has figured in this revision is with regard to the interpretation and applicability of the provisions of Sec. 13 (1) (l) of the Bombay rent Act in the light of the facts and circumstances of the case.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the original defendant-tenant and the respondents are the original plaintiffs landlords. For the sake of convenience and brevity, the parties are hereinafter referred to as the landlords, and tenant. The defendant is the tenant in respect of one room in the building bearing Municipal Census No. 17-136 situated in the city of Baroda, at a monthly rent of Rs. 35. 00. There is no dispute about the fact that the plaintiffs are the landlords and the defendant is the tenant in respect of the demise property consisted of one room.

( 3 ) TH

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top