SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Guj) 362

J.N.BHATT
HARILAL GORDHANBHAI – Appellant
Versus
RAMNIKLAL D. RATNESHWAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: SURESH M.SHAH, Y.S.LAKHANI

J. N. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) SHOULD the second application for fixation of standard rent after dismissal of the first application for non-prosecution upon receipt of notice of demand of rent of more than six months, under Sec. 12 (2) of the Bombay Rents, hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (the Rent Act for short) give protection to the tenant from an ejectment decree, is the theme of the present revision.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the original defendent-tenant and the respondents are the original plaintiff-landlods in respect of demised premises consisting of one room, Osri and kitchen on the ground floor situated in Vaniawadi Sheri No. 2 at Rajkot. The parties are hereinafter addressed to as the landlords and tenant for the sake of convenience and brevity. The demised premises were let to the tenant at the monthly agreed rent of Rs. 60. 00 inclusive of taxes.

( 3 ) THE landlords filed Regular Civil Suit No. 6 of 1980 in the Small Cause court at Rajkot for possession on the ground of non-payment of rent and also on the ground of nuisance and annoyance. The tenant resisted the suit by filing a written statement. On the basis of the pleadings, issues were settled at Exh. 30. The t























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top