J.N.BHATT
HARILAL GORDHANBHAI – Appellant
Versus
RAMNIKLAL D. RATNESHWAR – Respondent
( 1 ) SHOULD the second application for fixation of standard rent after dismissal of the first application for non-prosecution upon receipt of notice of demand of rent of more than six months, under Sec. 12 (2) of the Bombay Rents, hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (the Rent Act for short) give protection to the tenant from an ejectment decree, is the theme of the present revision.
( 2 ) THE petitioner is the original defendent-tenant and the respondents are the original plaintiff-landlods in respect of demised premises consisting of one room, Osri and kitchen on the ground floor situated in Vaniawadi Sheri No. 2 at Rajkot. The parties are hereinafter addressed to as the landlords and tenant for the sake of convenience and brevity. The demised premises were let to the tenant at the monthly agreed rent of Rs. 60. 00 inclusive of taxes.
( 3 ) THE landlords filed Regular Civil Suit No. 6 of 1980 in the Small Cause court at Rajkot for possession on the ground of non-payment of rent and also on the ground of nuisance and annoyance. The tenant resisted the suit by filing a written statement. On the basis of the pleadings, issues were settled at Exh. 30. The t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.