SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Guj) 420

B.C.PATEL, H.R.SHELAT
AJIT D. PADIVAL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: HARUBHAI MEHTA, K.S.Nanavati, M.R.ANAND, M.R.RAVAL

B. C. PATEL, J.

( 1 ) ). By way of Public Interest Litigation, in these two petitions, the petitioners have challenged the action of the State Government in reducing the limit of Narayan Sarovar Sanctuary in view of the Resolution dated 24th July, 1995 delimiting the area of "narayan Sarovar Chinkara Sanctuary" on the ground that the said action is unfair, bad in law, illegal and suffering from non-application of mind and would amount to by-passing the judgment and order rendered by this Court in special Civil Application Nos. 13139 of 1993, 6061 of 1994 and Letters Patent appeal No. 197 of 1994. The State Government altered the boundary of the sanctuary in accordance with the Resolution dated 24th July, 1995 passed by the legislative Assembly under Sec. 26-A (3) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. The facts giving rise to the present proceedings are briefly narrated hereinbelow :-

( 2 ) ). In exercise of powers conferred by Sec. 18 (1) of the Wild Life (Protection) act, 1972, the State Government vide its Resolution dated 14th April, 1981, declared and defined limits of forest area in Lakhpat Taluka falling in the Kachchh District, as specified in the Schedule annexed thereto,














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top