SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Guj) 415

Y.B.BHATT
Parmar Bhimji Govind – Appellant
Versus
Heirs of Patel Velji Ramji – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.D.Vyas, R.J.OZA

Y. B. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) THE present revision is one under section 29 (2) of the Bombay Rents; Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, (hereinafter referred to as the said act) wherein the petitioner is the original plaintiff-landlord and respondents are original defendants-tenants.

( 2 ) THE pertinent facts, in brief, leading to the present Revision are as under:2. 1 The petitioner-landlord had filed civil Suit No. 36/77 against the tenant for recovery of arrears of rent and for a decree of eviction against the tenant-on various grounds available to the said landlord under the said Act. 2. 2 This suit, viz. Regular Civil Suit No. 36/77 was filed on 21st February 1977. However, prior to the filing of the suit the tenant had already filed, on 6th April 1976, misc. Application No, 10/76 for determination of the standard rent of the leased premises under Section 11 of the said act. 2. 3 The trial court heard and decided both the suit as well as the application by a common judgment and order, whereby the suit was allowed and a decree for eviction was passed against the tenant, on the basis that the standard rent in respect of the leased premises was Rs. 9/- per month, and on a co










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top