Gujarat High Court
Judgename :R.K.Abichandani
HARSHADRAI SHANTILAL SHAH - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondent
S.C.A. 6047 of 1995
Decided On : 12/07/1995
( 1 ) LEAVE to amend. Permitted to place impugned order dated 11-7-1995 on record as part of Annexure "a" to the petition.
( 2 ) RULE. Mr. Dhaval Dave, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No. 1 - State. Mr. J. R, Nanavati, learned Advocate waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No. 2 - University. Mr. Y. S. Lakhani, learned Advocate waives service of rule on behalf of respondent Nos. 3, 12 and 14. Mr. V. H. Patel, learned Advocate waives service of rule on behalf of respondent no. 10. The learned Counsel for the petitioners craves leave to delete respondent nos. 4 to 9, 11, 13, IS and 16. These respondent Nos. 4 to 9, 11,13, 15 and 16 are permitted to be deleted. At the request of the learned Counsel appearing for these parties, the matter is finally heard and is being disposed of.
( 3 ) THE petitioners who were nominated by the State Government as members of the Senate under the provisions of Sec. 16 (1) - Class II (B) of the Saurashtra university Act, 1965 have challenged the order dated 11/07/1995 passed by the State Government cancelling their nominations, alongwith the nominations of 10 other persons and nominating 12 fresh members in their place. They have also challenged the consequential circular issued by the respondent No. 2 - University.
( 4 ) TWELVE members including the petitioners were nominated to the Senate by the State Government by its order dated 23-5-1992. The petitioners were nominees alongwith 10 other persons. According to the petitioners, the term of their office was of 5 years and therefore, they were entitled to continue till 20/05/1997. The impugned order cutting short their term and nominating 12 new members, according to them, is in contravention of the provisions of Sec. 16 (2) of the said act. It was submitted that the State Government could not have curtailed the term of their office of five years merely with a view to nominate 12 members of their choice. The stand of the State Government is that a person nominated has no right to hold the office for five years. The provision of Sec. 16 (2) refers to the term of office of five years and does not say that the nominee of the State Government shall be entitled to hold the office for a period of five years. It was submitted that the concept of nomination itself implied that the authority nominating the member can always withdraw him. The act of nomination is left to the subjective satisfaction of the State Government and therefore: according to the Assistant Government pleader, doctrine of pleasure of the State Government could be invoked ~and the nominees can hold office only during the pleasure of the State Government unless allowed to continue to remain in the office for a period of five years. It was also argued that effective dialogue would not be possible and the Government policies will not be effectively represented if the persons nominated by the previous government were allowed to continue. It was contended that the purpose underlying the provisions empowering the State. Government to nominate members was to ensure that the policies of the State Government were effectively represented in the senate through these nominees. Reliance was placed on the decisions of this High court in the case of Harisinh Pratapsinh Chavda v. Chimanbhai J. Patel, Chief minister and Ors. , reported in [1991 (1)1 32 (1) GLR 667 and of the Delhi High court in the case of Ghanshyam Singh v. Union of India and Ors. , reported in AIR 1991 Delhi 59 in support of the contention that it was open to the State Government to recall these nominees.
( 5 ) THE provision of Sec. 16 (1) - Class II (B) of the said Act inter-alia provides that the Senate shall consist of 12 members to be nominated from amongst distinguished educationists, social workers, trade unions, representatives of backward communities, women and such other class of persons. Section 16 (2) provides that the term of the office of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.