SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Guj) 460

R.K.ABICHANDANI
HARSHADRAI SHANTILAL SHAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: DHAVAL C.DAVE, H.M.MEHTA, J.R.Nanavati, VASAVDATTA BHATT, VIJAY H.PATEL, Y.S.LAKHANI

R. K. ABICHANDANI, J.

( 1 ) LEAVE to amend. Permitted to place impugned order dated 11-7-1995 on record as part of Annexure "a" to the petition.

( 2 ) RULE. Mr. Dhaval Dave, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No. 1 - State. Mr. J. R, Nanavati, learned Advocate waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No. 2 - University. Mr. Y. S. Lakhani, learned Advocate waives service of rule on behalf of respondent Nos. 3, 12 and 14. Mr. V. H. Patel, learned Advocate waives service of rule on behalf of respondent no. 10. The learned Counsel for the petitioners craves leave to delete respondent nos. 4 to 9, 11, 13, IS and 16. These respondent Nos. 4 to 9, 11,13, 15 and 16 are permitted to be deleted. At the request of the learned Counsel appearing for these parties, the matter is finally heard and is being disposed of.

( 3 ) THE petitioners who were nominated by the State Government as members of the Senate under the provisions of Sec. 16 (1) - Class II (B) of the Saurashtra university Act, 1965 have challenged the order dated 11/07/1995 passed by the State Government cancelling their nominations, alongwith the nominations of 10 other persons









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top