( 1 ) HEARD the learned Counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners are ordered to be placed under suspension vide office order No. 11/1996 dated 22-1-1996 passed by the District Judge, Kheda at Nadiad. The petitioners are placed under suspension in contemplation of the departmental inquiry. It has been mentioned in the order of suspension that they are being placed under suspension on the charges of grave misconduct, carelessness, dereliction in discharging their government duties, gross negligence to maintain accounts regularly and committing temporary misappropriation of the amount of Rs. 5,500/ -. The learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that there is no question of any misappropriation. Making references to certain documents relating to the proceedings of Criminal Misc. Application No. 12/1992 he contended that the amount of Rs. 5,500/- has been deposited by the concerned person in the Court only on 9-11-1992 but the date of depositing has erronously been mentioned 9-10-1992. On the basis of this contention, the learned Counsel for the petitioners tried to make out a case that there is no material whatsoever in support of the charge of temporary misa