SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Guj) 46

M.S.PARIKH
Yogesh Shivabhai Patel – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: KATHABEN GAJJAR, M.S.TRIVEDI

M. S. PARIKH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has brought under challenge the impugned order of acceptence of resignation alleged to have been tendered somewhere in the year 1985 and/or 1986 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

( 2 ) THE inpugned order of acceptance of resignation is dated 20. 12. 1990, that is to say, it is passed after a lapse of about 5 years. The facts of the petitioners case, shortly stated, are: the petitioner was appointed and serving as Civil Supervisor in the office of executive Engineer (R and B), Vadodara. since 6th December 1976. The petitioner had an occasion to obtain No Objection Certificate for proceeding to U. S. A. and he in fact had an occasion to proceed to U. S. A. and after return from U. S. A to resume his duty as Civil supervisor at Vadodara. It is the case of the petitioner that he was thereafter required to proceed on leave upto 20. 6. 1985 and was to resume duty on 21. 6. 1985. However, due to his illness he could not join duty between 21. 6. 1985 and 7. 2. 1986. As stated in his application dated 7. 2. 1986 wherein he had pointed out the fact with regard to his ill-health. He submitted necessary medical certificates in that respect. H








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top