SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Guj) 78

R.K.ABICHANDANI
URMILABEN MANGALSINH JADEJA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.D.Vyas, P.K.PAREKH, TUSHAR MEHTA

R. K. ABICHANDANI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners who are President and Vice- president of the Gondal Taluka Panchayat have preferred this petition challenging the order of the respondent No. 2 dated 18/10/1995 confirmed by the State government on 13-12-1995, by which it was ordered that the decision of the president taken on 27-7-1995 for adjourning the meeting was illegal and therefore, the proceedings which were taken at the said meeting by the majority members were valid and the Committees constituted pursuant to that, stood duly constituted. The * for quashing the Order passed by the Dist. Development Officer and confirmed by respondent No. 1. President was warned against the lapse in discharging her duties as a President, for the future.

( 2 ) IT was strongly contended on behalf of the petitioners that the Minutes which were recorded for the meeting which took place on 27-7-1995, a copy of which is at Annexure "d" to the petition, clearly discloses that there was chaos at the meeting and that the petitioner as a President was justified in adjourning the meeting. Reliance was placed on the provisions of Sec. 69 of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 which empowered the President to conv






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top