SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Guj) 256

K.R.VYAS
BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
VIJAY RAMNIKLAL KAPADIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: HARIN M.SOMPURA, J.T.TRIVEDI

K. R. VYAS, J.

( 1 ) ). This Appeal from Order under Order 43, Rule (1) (a) of the civil Procedure Code is filed by the appellant-Bank of India challenging the order passed below application, Ex. 12, in Special Civil Suit No. 242 of 1995 by the learned 3rd Joint Civil Judge (S. D.), Surat dated 8-1-1996 directing the appellant-bank to take the plaint to submit to the Debt Recovery Tribunal on or before 19-1-1996.

( 2 ) ). The appellant instituted the said suit for recovery of Rs. 13,86,000. 00 from the respondents (original defendants ). It is alleged that respondent No. 1, who was the employee in the main branch of the appellant-bank, committed fraud, in concert with respondent Nos. 2 and 3 (original defendant Nos. 2 and 3), which resulted in the aforesaid loss. The suit was, therefore, filed to recover the ill-gotten gains from the respondents, together with running interest and costs of the suit.

( 3 ) ). It appears that the suit was transferred to the Debt Recovery Tribunal at ahmedabad purportedly under Sec. 31 (2) of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as "the said Act" ). It further appears that the Tribunal in turn






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top