SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Guj) 321

J.N.BHATT
DEVSHANKAR AMBALAL JANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: S.I.NANAVATI

J. N. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) IN this petition under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India, the question has arisen as to whether the survey settlement of land revenue undertaken by some authority and accepted by the State Government would become survey settlement under Bombay Land Revenue Code and what is the interpretation and the applicability of the provisions of Secs. 73-A, 117-R and Sec. 216 of the bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 (B. L. R. Code) are the main questions which have come to the surface for examination and adjudication.

( 2 ) ). The petitioners have questioned the legality and validity of the order passed in revision by the respondent No. 1, State of Gujarat, recorded, on 30-11-1993, confirming the order of the Collector passed, on 15-9-1992, directing the petitioner to hand over possession of agricultural lands bearing survey Nos. 655 and 656 (disputed lands) on the ground that there is breach of the provisions of Secs. 73- a and 73-AA of the B. L. R. Code.

( 3 ) ). The land admeasuring 9 acres and 30 gunthas and 0. 37 guntha bearing survey Nos. 655 and 656 respectively situated, at Moje Mou, Taluka Idar, District sabarkantha, came to be surveyed and settled in the year 19













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top