SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Guj) 310

N.N.MATHUR
Premjibhai D. Karane @ Babubhai – Appellant
Versus
AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.A.Bhambhania, PRASHANT DESAI, S.R.BRAHMBHATT

N. N. MATHUR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Rule taken out at the instance of the petitioner-Premjibhai D karana, a tenant, who is running mailing Labour Work under the seal and title of Mehul consultancy Services on the C. G. Road in the City of Ahmedabad, against the respondent-Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation for an appropriate writ or direction under article 226 of the Constitution of India quashing and setting aside the order of the municipal Commissioner, Ahmedabad dated 31. 12. 1994 under Sec. 210 (1) (a) of the bombay Provincial Municipal Act, 1959 (for short, the BPMC Act) prescribing the street-line and the notices dated 29. 1. 1995 and 28. 5. 1995 under Sec. 212 of the BPMC act, calling upon the petitioner to demolish or remove the portion of the shop coming within the road-line within a period of 35 days and to make the land underneath open.

( 2 ) THE facts as culled out from the pleadings of the parties appear that the petitioner, a tenant in the building situated in Jagdishpur T. P. Scheme No. III, Final plot No. 318, received a notice dated 29. 1. 1995 calling upon him to show cause as to why a part of the shop which is coming in the way of widening the road should not be demoli















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top