SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Guj) 313

N.N.MATHUR
NARABHAI VELJIBHAI CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
R. S. VAGHELA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.PANDEY, J.M.PATEL, P.K.JANIKIRAN

N. N. MATHUR, J.

( 1 ) ). THIS Special Civil Application under Art. 226 of the constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to quash the order dated 28- 10-1995 passed by the Addl. Development Commissioner, State of Gujarat, whereby he set aside the order passed by the respondent No. 2 District Development Officer, mehsana suspending the respondent No. 3 Akbarbhai Rahimbhai Momin from the office of Sarpanch under the provisions of Sec. 59 (1) of the Gujarat Panchayats act, 1993.

( 2 ) THE short facts of the case are that the petitioner lodged First Information report at Sidhpur Police Station on 20-2-1995 stating inter-alia that on the said day the respondent No. 3 alongwith about 7 persons arrived on the spot armed with dharia and other weapons and attacked on him and others. It is also stated that respondent No. 3 Sarpanch inflicted injuries on his person. On this information, the police registered a case against the respondent and others for offence under sec. 147, 148, 149, 324, 323, 504 and 506 (2) of I. P. C. As the respondent No. 3 was holding the office of Sarpanch, the proceeding under Sec. 59 (1) of the Gujarat panchayats Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as "th







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top