SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Guj) 327

S.M.SONI
KAMUBEN – Appellant
Versus
PARMAR chamanbhai NARSINHBHAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.P.Joshi, K.P.RAVAL, M.B.BUKHARI, M.C.PATEL

S. M. SONI, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER - victim in the case - has filed this application for cancellation of bail granted in favour of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 by this Court (Coram : D. G. Karia J.) by his order dated 9-12-1994 in Misc. Criminal Application no. 4860 of 1994. This application is filed on the ground that the accused are threatening the victim repeatedly. However, for the same, complaints are registered, one on 14-12-1994 and another on 11-4-1995. It is further alleged that the respondents are strong-headed persons and indulge in liquor and other anti-social activities. It is, therefore, prayed for cancellation of the bail granted by this Court.

( 2 ) AT the outset, learned Advocate for the petitioner states that he does not press this application qua respondent No. 4, namely, Bhaiya Ramkaran Parshuram, as he could not be served of this application and his whereabouts are not known. He also requests that in case of exigency in future, he reserves his right to file such an application.

( 3 ) ORDINARILY, when an order of bail is granted under Sec. 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (code for short), the following conditions may be imposed :-" (A) such person shall attend in ac






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top