SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Guj) 370

J.N.BHATT
GUJARAT STATE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
GHANSHYAMBHAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.H.BAGCHI, S.B.VAKIL

J. N. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) RULE Service of Rule is waived by Mr. S. B. Vakil on behalf of the respondent.

( 2 ) THIS is an application for review of the judgment and order recorded by this Court in Civil Revision Application No. 263 of 1989 on April 10, 1995, whereby, time for arbitration proceedings came to be enlarged exercising powers under Sec. 28 of the Arbitration Act.

( 3 ) ). This Court after enlarging time under S. 28 directed the Arbitrator to dispose of the disputes under reference as expeditiously as possible but not later than four months from the date of receipt of service of notice to both the parties after receiving writ of this Court. When the said revision was heard, the attention of this Court was not drawn to the provisions of the Gujarat Public Works Contracts disputes Arbitration Tribunal Act, 1992 S. 3 came into force on 5th December, 1991 and the remaining provisions of the Act came into force on 1st January, 1994 as per the notification published in the Official Gazette. The judgment and order in the aforesaid Civil Revision Application was passed on April 10, 1995. Therefore, the provisions of the Gujarat Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal act,





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top