( 1 ) ). Heard learned Counsels for the parties. The petitioner was appointed as daily wager clerk in the office of respondent No. 1 in the month of February 1984. On 7th March 1984 the petitioner was given temporary appointment against the leave vacancy. Again leave vacancy has occurred during the promotion of one of the incumbents thereof in the said office and the petitioner was given appointment under the order dated 31st May 1984. This appointment was given to the petitioner purely on temporary basis without any selection and was approved by the Board in its general meeting vide Resolution No. 68. This Resolution of the Board has been challenged by one Shri Gokaldas Madhavji Gandhi before the Collector of the District concerned. Under the order dated 6th September 1984, the said Resolution has been cancelled by the Collector. After cancellation of the said order, the petitioner was terminated from services. Hence this petition before this Court.

( 2 ) ). The learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that the Collector has committed serious illegality by cancelling the said Resolution of the Board dated 29th July 1984. The learned Counsel for the petitioner