SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Guj) 462

M.R.CALLA
Mohmad Sarif @ Kalio Nurmohmadsamibapu Shaikh – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Police – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.R.BHATT, NIGAM R.SHUKLA

M. R. CALLA, J.

( 1 ) THROUGH this Special Civil Application under Art. 226 of the constitution of India, the petitioner-detenu seeks to challenge his detention order dated 16. 4. 1996 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City under the provisions of gujarat Prevention of Antisocial Activities Act, 1985. The detention order was executed on the same day i. e. 16. 4. 1996 and since then the petitioner-detenu is under detention.

( 2 ) THIS Special Application is filed in this Court on 30. 4. 1996 and on 1. 5. 1996 Rule returnable on 22. 7. 1996 was issued with the direction to the respondents to file an affidavit-in-reply, if they so desire. It is given out by Mr. Shukla, learned A. P. P. that the department was served with the notice of this petition on 23. 6. 1996. However, the respondents have chosen not to file any affidavit-in-reply to this petition and therefore, the factual allegations made by the petitioner-detenu in the petition remain uncontroverted. Mr. Shukla, learned APP has submitted that it has been the practice throughout to argue the detention matters without filing any affidavit-in-reply and only oral submissions are made at the time of arguments on the basis









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top