SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Guj) 463

N.J.PANDYA, R.BALIA
ANWAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.DESAI, BANNA S.DUTTA

( 1 ) THE accused-appellant of Criminal Case No. 6 of 1990 came to be convicted of offences under Sec. 20 (b) of the Narcotic Drugs and psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the N. D. P. S. Act) by the learned Sessions Judge of Kutch at Bhuj by his order dated 24-1-1992. As a result the learned Judge awarded 10 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of rs. 1 Lakh and in default to undergo one more year of imprisonment.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to the aforesaid result at the end of the trial are that on 30th april, 1990, complainant - a P. I. of the State Police had received information about two persons being in the process of bringing contraband article (narcotic) for the purpose of selling. Alongwith Panchas, therefore, complainant - P. I. and members of the raiding party went at the likely place from where the accused were to pass and waited there. Their wait was rewarded. Two persons on seeing the waiting party started running away and the police party succeeded in catching hold of them.

( 3 ) IN the course of search, 450 gms. of a material which was ultimately found to be charas was recovered from the present accused-appellant and after taking out for th








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top