N.N.MATHUR
NARMADA CEMENT COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner-Company is engaged in manufacture of cement. Respondent No. 2 Executive Engineer, Irrigation Mechanical Division No. 3, invited tender for supply of ordinary portland cement and possolone portland cement having I. S. I. mark to the extent of 1,00,000 M. T. as per tender notice No. 4 of 1990-91. In response to the said tender notice, the petitioner submitted tender which was accepted and in pursuance thereto an agreement in Form-D was entered into between the petitioner and the respondent No. 2. The petitioner supplied 40,621. 75 M. T. cement under the contract costing Rs. 6,76,27,702. 31 against which the respondent made payment of Rs. 6,52,38,900. 80 by various cheques. An amount of Rs. 23,88,801. 49 has been withheld by respondent No. 2 alleging that the said amount has been adjusted on various accounts which is evident from the letter dated 8-8-1994 annexed at Annexure b. The details of the withheld amount of rs. 23,88,801. 49 as pointed out in the aforesaid communication are as under : a) Recoveries towards short supply of cement. Rs. 10,131. 90 b) Recovery towards cost of levy cement of drainage division, Navsari Rs. 9,792. 71 c) Charges of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.