SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Guj) 618

N.N.MATHUR
Yashodhar Omkarlalji Jain – Appellant
Versus
Gandluri Ramanuj Nevalu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.N.DOCTOR, Yashodhar Omkarlalji Jain

N. N. MATHUR, J.

( 1 ) THIS Criminal Miscellaneous Application has been filed by Yashodhar omkarlalji Jain, party-in-person under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in the matter of complainant case No. 53/94 pending in the Court of the Metropolitan magistrate, Court No. 2, Ahmedabad. The petitioner has prayed that, respondents No 4 to 9 may be added in the said case as an accused for the offence under Sections 166, 219, 420, 427, 120-B IPC and also that the case be tried by the court of Sessions judge.

( 2 ) ON 29th February 1996, this Court (Coram: D. G. Karia, J.) directed to issue fresh notice, as it was found from the report dated December 31, 1995 that though the notices had been served on the respondents NO. 1 to 9 in the Branch office of the State Bank of India, at C. N. Vidhyalaya, no signature were taken from any of the respondents. Thus, in the opinion of the Court, the service was insufficient. Shri R. N. Doshit, learned Counsel, however put his appearance for the Deputy general Manager, State Bank of India. In view of this, a fresh notices were directed to be issued to the unserved respondents no. 1 to 9, making it returnable on 19-3- 1996. On 2-4-1996, the par












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top