SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Guj) 81

N.N.MATHUR
AMRATLAL DEVDANBHAI SONI – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR OF REVENUE intelligence – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.B.NAIK, K.P.RAVAL, K.R.JANI, M.R.GEHANI

N. N. MATHUR, J.

( 1 ) BY way of this common judgment, these two petitions filed by petitioner-Amratlal D. Soni - one under S. 482 of the Criminal Procedure code, challenging the order dated 4-2-1996 passed by the Addl. City Sessions Judge, court No. 14, Ahmedabad, in exercise of powers under S. 319 of the Code of criminal Procedure at the instance of Dr. Bipin Panchal, accused No. 2, issued nonbailable warrant with a view to proceed against him for offence under Secs. 22 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1985) read with S. 120-B of the I. P. C. in Sessions Case No. 162 of 1994 and another Revision Application under S. 397 of the Cr. P. C. challenging the order passed on the same day, i. e. , on 4-1-1996 framing charges against the petitioner for the said offences along with other accused persons, are disposed of.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts are that Dy. Director of Revenue Intelligence, Ahmedabad filed a complaint on 23-5-1994 in the competent Court against seven accused persons, namely, A-1 - Achit Patel alias Mahesh Shah, A-2 - Dr. Bipin Panchal, a-3 - Arvind S. Soni, A-4 - Prahlad M. Patel, A-5 - Revabhai K. Patel,












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top