SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Guj) 177

J.M.PANCHAL
VORA AMINBAI IBRAHIM – Appellant
Versus
VORA TAHERALI MOHMEDALI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.M.MEHTA, SURESH M.SHAH

J. M. PANCHAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS Second Appeal under S. 100 of the Code of Civil procedure, 1908, has arisen from the suit brought by respondents for redemption of property which was mortgaged to the deceased appellant.

( 2 ) THE suit property is a building situated in Jamnagar City and is described in detail in list "a" appended to the plaint. The suit property originally belonged to deceased Sugrabai. She was owner and in possession of the suit property since long. The suit property was mortgaged by deceased Sugrabai for Rs. 2,000. 00 to the deceased appellant by executing an unregistered deed dated April 21, 1965. The period of mortgage was stipulated to be of 5 years in the said deed. On the date of execution of the unregistered mortgage deed, possession of the property was handed over to the deceased appellant. It may be stated that during the pendency of the Second Appeal, the original appellant, i. e. , Vora Aminabai Ibrahim expired on May 10, 1995, and her heirs and legal representatives have been brought on the record of the case by allowing Civil Application No. 1531 of 1995. Deceased sugrabai had instituted Regular Civil Suit No. 307 of 1972 in the Court of learned civil Judg












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top